
Feed
M.T. Anderson
New York: Candlewick Press, 2004
Genre: Science Fiction/Dystopia
Read if: You like dystopic fantasy that comments on our modern world
Best for: Older teens (16 +) who are thinking about the conflicts and hypocrisies of today's society.
If you like it, try:
How I Live Now by Meg Rossoff
Rating: 3/5
This is what the future looks like: information has been freed from its physical confines; computers no longer exist, because everyone has a feed implanted directly into their heads. These feeds send instant information to everyone at a rapid pace. Instant messages, entertainment, advertisements - it all appears instantly inside your head.
Titus and his friends have all grown up with the feed (it gets implanted in infancy). They spend their time going to the moon, hanging out, experimenting with going "mal" (a drug like coma induced by certain programs from the feed) and consuming products introduced by the feed.
Everything changes for Titus when he meets home-schooled Violet. Violet got the feed late, and questions what the feed is doing to her and her peers. She sees the lesions growing on their skin as a bad omen rather than a fashion statement, and the consumeristic world around them as menacing rather than utopic. Through Violet, Titus begins to understand that life with the feed may be a threat to them all.
I could talk about the plot of Feed for many more paragraphs: this novel is complicated and surprising (what else would you expect from M.T. Anderson). Everywhere you think its going, it doesn't go. But you'll have to read it to see.
There are two major things I think are important when talking about Feed and its place as a resource for young adults: controversy and teen culture.
First, controversy. There are certain requirements I have to fufill for the parameters of this project, and one of them is to read a controversial young adult novel. Feed was one of the novels on the list, and after reading it, I had to clarify the reason with my professor. I was confused about Feed's status as a controversial book, because although it is difficult book, a challenging book, and a disturbing book in many ways, the content is not 'objectionable' in the way we usually think of that word. Don't get me wrong - Feed is devastating, but this is because it tells us things we already know - that we are not far from the vapidly consumeristic culture that is rotting the world of Feed. But upsetting as these ideas are, I would not call them particularly controversial.
The reason for Feed's status as a controversial book is a matter of language. In portraying his future youth, Anderson uses slang that is close, but not quite, that of our own (dude becomes unit, cool becomes brag, really becomes meg). He also uses quite a bit of swearing. In the very thoughtful interview "Hungry for M.T. Anderson" by Joel Shoemaker (VOYA, 2004), Anderson directly answers the question of some librarians being hesitant to shelve Feed because of the swearing. Anderson says the language was necessary to the plot, to show the degeneration of language in the world of the feed.
My personal feeling about the language in Feed is that it is not extreme enough to warrant controversy. It is not gratuitous and is there to serve a very specific purpose. Teens will be discerning enough to understand exactly why Anderson wrote the way he did. And, the swearing isn't actually that prevalent. I have read several other young adult novels where the language was much more prominent. There is so much going on in Feed that the 'objectionable' language is, I would argue, not very objectionable at all. In the end, I think this controversy should not be a controversy at all: Feed should be on the bookshelves of school libraries.
On to the second point: teen culture. Anderson has written a scathing satire of modern culture, an the role that teens play/fight against in that culture. It's for this reason I found this book difficult to take at times. It definitely wasn't my favourite read for this project. There is something about Anderson's message that is at times heavy handed, and could be seen as criticizing or blaming teens for the way they live now. Teen culture is something to be reviled. This is not to say that teens (or any of us) should not be challenged on the way we live our lives. Its just that this book is at times so bleak and accusatory that it leaves the reader out completely. I never felt totally connected with this book, and I think it might be difficult for a teen audience to connect with it too. Feed is ultimately hollow; maybe that is the point Anderson seeks to make. The problem is, its hollowness alienates readers.
After reading the VOYA article, I felt I understood better just what Anderson was trying to say about teen culture. Anderson is someone who is deeply concerned with the state of America and he talks about how angry he was as a teen that society expected him to be part of the teen culture machine. From this standpoint, the book seems less accusatory.
All this aside, I think Feed is a book that will appeal to teens who are questioning the world around them (and who isn't?), although they may ultimately find it unsatisfying. Anderson is a very talented and versatile young adult author, and Feed deserves a place on library bookshelves. Read it, unit, and see where you weigh in on the controversy.

















